Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 02:02
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Aaron Rodgers says decision to sign with Steelers 'was best for my soul' - NFL.com
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
'Mountainhead' Is Most-Watched HBO Original Film Since 'Bad Education' - Deadline
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Et expedita consequatur quam et.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
US Steel workers see hope of job security in deal with Japan’s Nippon - Financial Times
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Was Adam white or black (African)?
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Qui eaque occaecati facere et.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
How did it feel when experiencing gay sex for the first?
Thank you.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear: